NFL Week 9: Some Loser Local Looks
by Memphis Bengal on Monday, November 9th, 2009 at 06:35am

As always, it’s more fun to look in on pain as opposed to joy when it comes to the morning after in the NFL. It just is. So, let’s see what is being said in…:
—…New York! Nothing good about the Giants, who have indeed lost the cover of the Yankees, and that four-game losing streak is now painfully exposed. Gary Myers in the Daily News:
Tom Coughlin stopped for a moment Sunday night before heading down a hallway leading to the coaches’ locker room. He had a blank look on his face as he stood and stared back into the players’ locker room, saying nothing. Clearly, Coughlin was still in shock over the most excruciating regular-season loss in his six years as the Giants’ coach, the fourth in a row after the 5-0 start, the one that could eventually blow up the season, if it hasn’t already.
“It’s not the end of the world. We’re not going to panic,” Mathias Kiwanuka said. “We are professional athletes. We are here to do a job. We’re just going to get it done. The bottom line is we got seven more games left and seven chances to turn it around. It’s not over.” Even though the Giants played better than they had in getting outscored 112-61 the last three weeks by the Saints, Cardinals and Eagles, and even though seven games remain to turn this around, it could be that this loss sucked what little life was left out of the team. The season is now officially on life support.
Yes, it is, as New York is in the Wild Card mix, not really in the win-the-division mix. And the Wild Card mix is a tough spot to be in, in the NFC, with Atlanta and Philly running ahead of them and the carcass’ of Green Bay and Chicago just behind them. Not optimal, to say the least.
—…Chicago! Where the memories of defenses past is haunting any Bears fan at this point. And should be haunting Lovie Smith. David Waugh in the Chcago Tribune on the Smith issue:
If you are looking for answers from Lovie Smith to explain why his team responded to a sense of urgency with apathy, keep looking. You might say Smith didn’t have a clue after the Bears’ 41-21 loss Sunday to the Cardinals at Soldier Field. “I don’t have a lot of reasons to give you on why we played that way,” Smith said with a straight face. There are 5.5 million reasons that’s not acceptable. As one of the league’s highest-paid head coaches, Smith is the most qualified person to help everybody understand why his historically inept defense gave up 31 points again in the first half. That happened for the second time in three weeks — and only five times in Bears history before this season. Smith is best equipped to explain how the Bears gave up 182 yards rushing to the worst running team in the NFL. And why a defense that can look so dominant for a 5-minute stretch in the fourth quarter needs to fall behind 34-7 before showing a pulse. If Smith cannot offer plausible reasons the Bears played as awfully as they did, exactly who can? More significantly, if the head coach fresh off a jarring 20-point loss cannot take a stab at what went so wrong, should anybody believe he grasps the ability to make it right?
This isn’t another call for Smith’s job. After the Bears miss the postseason for the third straight year as is now likely, Smith should be given a playoffs-or-else mandate for 2010. Given Smith’s resume and contract — he has $11 million and two seasons left after this one — that’s fair, firm and fiscally responsible. This has nothing to do with how Smith acts at the podium either. This has to do with whether Smith knew Sunday how the season got away from the schizophrenic Bears. Or if anybody on the Halas Hall payroll without a degree in psychiatry knows.
Really? One more year for Smith after this? That Super Bowl appearance was awhile ago now. And I don’t think the return of Urlacher fixes what is ailing them. More importantly, the appearance that Smith has a grasp on the problem and how to go about fixing it would go a long way to appease what is becoming an increasingly angry fanbase. And right now, Smith is not giving off that appearance.
—…Green Bay! Losing twice to Brett Favre, that must hurt something awful. Losing the previously winless Bucs? Fetid icing on a crapcake. Mike Vandermause in the Green Bay Gazette on the carnage:
This was as embarrassing at it gets for the Green Bay Packers. It marks the low point of the Mike McCarthy coaching tenure in Green Bay and raises serious questions about where the Packers are heading. “Every loss is embarrassing,” linebacker Nick Barnett said. “For me, it doesn’t matter what their record is. I think the most embarrassing thing for us is that we had this game won and we let them make a play.” Actually, no loss in the last four seasons under McCarthy was quite this bad, and a terrible Buccaneers team made not just one play, but several late in the game to stun the shell-shocked Packers. Blowing an 11-point fourth-quarter lead against one of the worst teams in the NFL is bad enough, but the colossal collapse could ruin the Packers’ season.
Yes, it could indeed do that. Or, the swiss cheese offensive line has already done that. I would wager the latter sure as hell led to the former. Seriously, Aaron Rodgers may end up hospitalized when Green Bay has to go to Pittsburgh.
Ugly.
![]()
TAGS Chicago Bears, Green Bay Packers, Local looks, new york giants |
