Reason #47,812 why Tim McCarver should never broadcast another baseball game!
by edwzipper on Friday, October 23rd, 2009 at 12:23am
I really wanted to enjoy tonight’s game. I was really looking forward to it. And it’s not that the Yankees lost, it’s that listening to Tim McCarver is almost as painful as the inflammation in my small intestine this summer.
Tim tried to create a discussion, controversy, commentary or something like that over the fact that John Lackey was being removed from the game. McCarver, like a fish wife, continually whined about how unreliable the Angels bullpen is, and while though correct, he did neglect to mention the main difference this year is that Arte Moreno did not want to part with some serious cash to keep K-Rod. The only thing that Francisco Rodríguez did last year was set the season saves record, come in 3rd in the Cy Young and 6th in the MVP.
Let’s recap the situation. At the time Lackey left the game he was at 104 pitches, 62 of which were strikes. Not an absolute indication to remove your team’s best pitcher. Here is an interesting factoid from LoHud: If you’re looking for a weird prop bet on the game tonight, see if someone will give you action on how long Lackey will stay in the game; in each of his three postseason starts against the Yankees, he’s lasted exactly 5 2/3 innings each time.
Here is the actually play by play of the 7th inning from Yahoo sports:
Top 7th: NY Yankees
- N. Swisher flied out to shallow center
- M. Cabrera doubled to right
- J. Posada walked
- D. Jeter walked, M. Cabrera to third, J. Posada to second
- J. Damon flied out to left
- D. Oliver relieved J. Lackey
So bases loaded, two out, 104 pitches, the Yankees #3 hitter Mark Teixeira at the plate. And then McCarver loses whatever, if anything, is left of his mind. This from the man that eschews statistics. There is absolutely no reason to let facts get in the middle of a good argument.
If I was managing the Angels, I would have taken Lackey out then too. Maybe I don’t bring in Oliver, but that’s a different discussion. So why do I agree with Mike Scioscia? Mainly because I own a computer. Is there not a guy in the production truck that feeds McCarver and Buck stats?
The hardest part of obtaining the evidence to prove McCarver’s point was just another turd on his already mountainous dung heap, was figuring out how to spell Teixeira. Don’t even bother to try to figure it out, just cut and paste from the box score like I did. So then I went to Yahoo (a super secret site just for computer geeks) and I entered the following: Mark Teixeira versus John Lackey. You can try it yourself, it’s fun. And the results are simply that Mark Teixeira pwns Lackey.
From ESPN:19 Hits in 49 ABs with 2 Dingers, 11 Ribbies, .388 avg, .464OBP, .551 slugging, for a 1.015 OPS.
So take that Timmy. You have as much information at your finger tips as an Amish-man. At least they have a reason.

What would you do with a frozen head? Play soccer? Go bowling? Haunted house? There really aren’t that many things I can think of doing. It’s not even useful as part of a ”Weekend at Bernie’s” sequel.




